The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

DUKR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

KRUS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

KLC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AEVA · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureDUKRKRUSKLCAEVA
Moat Score (0–100)2728 (highest)28 (highest)27
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend2059 (highest)5357
Pricing power10 (highest)0
Returns on capital033 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)28055 (highest)
Capital discipline24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price data1040% above high estimateNo price data
Market cap$11.3M$528.8M$615.4M$979.1M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025