The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EFX · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EFX | ARLO | GGRP | CMRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 | 76 (highest) | 57 | 62 |
| Pricing power | — | 15 | 79 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 19 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 26 | 100 (highest) | 55 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 54 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 57% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $21.7B | $1.4B | $16.8M | $244.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |