The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EGY · Materials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DJCO · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EGY | DJCO | TPR | KMB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 52 | 85 (highest) | 48 | 52 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 98 (highest) | 57 |
| Returns on capital | 91 | 0 | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 24 | 45 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 60 (highest) | 40 | 49 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 15% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 24% above high estimate | 182% above high estimate | 68% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $549.4M | $1.1B | $29.4B | $36.0B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |