The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EMN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EMN | BLGO | PURE | CPSH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 57 (highest) | 41 | 50 |
| Pricing power | 39 | 68 | 93 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 46 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 28 | 28 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 14 | 34 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 49% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data | 429% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $15.2B | — | $6.7M | $80.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |