The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EOG · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LIN · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EOG | LIN | PNRG | EBF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 | 73 (highest) | 72 | 70 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 82 | 96 (highest) | 69 | 43 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 98 (highest) | 53 |
| Returns on capital | 64 | 26 | 18 | 74 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 94 | 76 | 78 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 94 | 100 (highest) | 80 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 2% below high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | — | — | $305.7M | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |