The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NAVN · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ESE | NAVN | AMD | DSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 | 66 (highest) | 65 | 65 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 70 | 72 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 64 | 93 (highest) | 58 | 75 |
| Returns on capital | 13 | — | 74 (highest) | 21 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 70 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 79 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 55 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 290% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 1232% above high estimate | 539% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $8.5B | Not reported | $850.8B | $717M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |