The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EVGO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LVLU · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
WOOF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | EVGO | LVLU | WOOF | FNKO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 15 | 68 (highest) | 47 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 73 (highest) | 66 | 58 |
| Returns on capital | — | 7 | 5 | 14 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 1 | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 11% below high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $49.4M | $775.5M | $306.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |