The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EXE · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EXE | SWIM | RCKY | AUMN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 69 | 81 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | 49 | 57 (highest) | 47 |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 5 | 16 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 65 (highest) | 20 | 24 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 76 (highest) | 42 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 1141% above high estimate | 24% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $713.4M | $307.6M | $3.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |