The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FRGT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FRGT | UUU | FCEL | CAPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 22 | 44 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 38 (highest) | 0 | 34 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 | 0 | 9 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 45 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 367% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $7.7M | $11.0M | $914.1M | $2.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |