The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FULO · Communications · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RSI · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OSW · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FULO | RSI | OSW | PRKA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 69 (highest) | 68 | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 | 77 | 81 (highest) | 58 |
| Pricing power | 92 | 54 | — | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 39 | 77 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 77 | 73 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 | 73 (highest) | 25 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 43% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data | 264% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $6.8M | — | — | $29.4M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |