The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

GANX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TWST · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MITQ · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

IPSC · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureGANXTWSTMITQIPSC
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend4366 (highest)5763
Pricing power3442 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital discipline44 (highest)2444 (highest)24
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$68.6M$5.3B$5.4M$191.7M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025
GANX vs TWST vs MITQ vs IPSC — Moat Score Comparison · Buy Like Buffett