The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GBUX · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BELFA · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GBUX | BELFA | CREX | TACT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | — | 63 (highest) | 49 |
| Pricing power | 42 | 22 | 54 | 73 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 30 (highest) | 0 | 14 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 476% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $39625 | Not reported | $35.8M | $52.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |