The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SHC · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GEHC | CPIX | SHC | ELSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 54 (highest) | 47 | 51 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 98 (highest) | 92 | 88 |
| Returns on capital | 63 (highest) | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 41 | 55 | — | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 21 | 48 (highest) | 44 | 16 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 633% above high estimate |
| Market cap | Not reported | $98.9M | Not reported | $26.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |