The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GENK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GENK | DCO | NORD | ISPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 (highest) | 42 | 28 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 30 | 71 (highest) | 58 |
| Returns on capital | 12 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 82% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 457% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $9.2M | $2.5B | $46.9M | $19.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |