The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GFMH · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
PRKS · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GFMH | PRKS | WBD | TTGT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 | 51 (highest) | 50 | 49 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 29 | 70 | 75 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 70 | — | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 30 | 49 (highest) | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 2 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 64 | 80 (highest) | 70 | 42 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 161% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $486377 | — | $64.1B | $282.7M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |