The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GHC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CPNG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GHC | SFIX | CPNG | HLLY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 45 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 71 | 49 | 78 | 88 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 76 (highest) | 16 | 67 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 | — | 12 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 31 | 55 | 64 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 80 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 60 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 4% below high estimate | No price data | 1682% above high estimate | 8% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $5.1B | $503.5M | $30.5B | $309.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |