The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OFAL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GIFT | OFAL | PRTS | CENN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | — | 48 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 3 | 29 | 52 (highest) | 1 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 7 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 42 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $29.9M | $2.9M | $348.8M | $4.9M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |