The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GOGO · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GOGO | LBTYA | MGAM | LUMN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 | 37 (highest) | 36 | 36 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 68 (highest) | 20 | 30 | 52 |
| Pricing power | — | 99 | 100 (highest) | 82 |
| Returns on capital | 52 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 64 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 54% below high estimate | 81% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $472.1M | $3.5B | $27937 | $6.5B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |