The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GTLL | DV | FATN | HQI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 | 65 (highest) | 64 | 64 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 90 (highest) | 47 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | — | 8 | 76 (highest) | 56 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 72 | 73 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 52 | 26 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 51% above high estimate | 12% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $1.9B | $63.0M | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |