The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GWLL · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GWLL | UTZ | WEST | TOFB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 23 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 45 | 58 (highest) | 17 |
| Pricing power | 48 (highest) | 43 | 20 | 38 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 6 | 0 | 11 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | — | 28 | 44 (highest) | 20 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 7257% above high estimate | No price data | 111% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $89.1M | $653.9M | $706.2M | $3.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |