The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GXO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GXO | GPUS | BE | BBCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 59 | 66 (highest) | 48 |
| Pricing power | — | 19 | 3 | 74 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 12 | 28 | 36 (highest) | 1 |
| Capital discipline | 48 (highest) | 44 | 44 | 20 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 176% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | 69% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $6.0B | — | — | $537.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |