The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

HIGR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AOUT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AIXN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureHIGRTHAOUTAIXN
Moat Score (0–100)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)40
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend2035 (highest)3216
Pricing power486477 (highest)74
Returns on capital26 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital discipline39244044 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price data107% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)1187% above high estimateNo price data
Market cap$3.1M$1.6B$169.3M$6.5M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2026FY2025