The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ICE · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ABX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BEN · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RPC · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureICEABXBENRPC
Moat Score (0–100)4850 (highest)50 (highest)46
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend62573295 (highest)
Pricing power100
Returns on capital182464 (highest)10
Balance-sheet safety25966 (highest)4
Capital discipline85 (highest)603774
Price vs. high estimate91% above high estimate310% above high estimate73% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)No price data
Market cap$82.7B$1.0B$16.9BNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025