The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INVU · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | INVU | GTLL | HQI | PINS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 63 | 43 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 86 | 70 | 70 | 94 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 56 (highest) | 5 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 100 (highest) | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 62 | 24 | 80 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 694% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $49.9M | — | — | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |