The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

IPSC · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MITQ · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GANX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SMMT · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureIPSCMITQGANXSMMT
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend63 (highest)574313
Pricing power42
Returns on capital0007 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety555578 (highest)
Capital discipline2444 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$191.7M$5.4M$68.6M$10.5B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025