The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

IVVD · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PRAX · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

INM · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AVR · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureIVVDPRAXINMAVR
Moat Score (0–100)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend70 (highest)70 (highest)5520
Pricing power3470 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety555578 (highest)55
Capital discipline44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)24
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$193.2M$7.7B$3.0M$341.8M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025