The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JANL · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DTGI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JANL | DTGI | ZDGE | SSTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 62 (highest) | 61 | 54 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 35 | 54 | 70 | 85 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 56 (highest) | — | 11 | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 33 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 594% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $55.8M | $692006 | — | $107.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |