The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JBLU · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JBLU | TOPP | TWI | OLOX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 19 | 20 (highest) | 20 (highest) | 19 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 (highest) | 12 | 42 | 21 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 9 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 12 | 14 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 0 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 24 | 33 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 633% above high estimate | 26% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $2.0B | $14.2M | $483.5M | $3.4M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |