The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KITL · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KITL | AN | ACM | MAMO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 69 (highest) | 65 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 28 | 5 | 40 |
| Returns on capital | — | 53 | 30 | 91 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 40 | 51 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | — | 85 (highest) | 12 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 134% above high estimate | 19% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $841908 | $7.0B | $9.0B | $39.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |