The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KLC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FATAQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
KRUS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DUKR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KLC | FATAQ | KRUS | DUKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 54 | 59 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | — | — | 10 |
| Returns on capital | 33 (highest) | 5 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 1040% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $615.4M | $1725 | $528.8M | $11.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |