The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNX · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ULCC · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KNX | ULCC | PPIH | RR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 34 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 68 (highest) | 54 | 36 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 13 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 6 | 36 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 34 | 55 | 57 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 28 | 24 | 30 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 409% above high estimate | No price data | 87% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $12.3B | $1.4B | $202.8M | $195.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |