The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KPEA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SVV · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | KPEA | SVV | DLTH | TLYS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 52 | 54 (highest) | 40 |
| Pricing power | 85 | 49 | 88 (highest) | 46 |
| Returns on capital | — | 62 (highest) | 45 | 34 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 58 (highest) | 28 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 1 | 6 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 157% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 782% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $90.2M | $1.5B | $145.4M | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |