The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

KRUS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PTLO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FATAQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

KLC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureKRUSPTLOFATAQKLC
Moat Score (0–100)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend5973 (highest)5453
Pricing power
Returns on capital014533 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)028 (highest)0
Capital discipline24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price data1040% above high estimate
Market cap$528.8M$1725$615.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2024FY2025