The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LEE · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LEE | BRN | KNF | MYE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 | 50 (highest) | 49 | 49 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 25 | 16 | 78 (highest) | 51 |
| Pricing power | — | 86 (highest) | 24 | 52 |
| Returns on capital | 97 (highest) | 88 | 62 | 45 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 33 | 27 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 24 | 55 (highest) | 39 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 79% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 155% above high estimate | 179% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $48.2M | $12.8M | $4.5B | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |