The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LIMX · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PRSU · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HWNI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LIMX | PRSU | VSAT | HWNI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 | 40 (highest) | 39 | 38 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 13 | 44 | 59 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 27 |
| Returns on capital | — | 14 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | — | 11 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 0 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 477% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $16.0M | $1.5B | $9.5B | $163014 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2024 |