The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MIBE · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LOAR | PVH | MIBE | ONT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 56 | 30 | 66 |
| Pricing power | 82 | 92 (highest) | 89 | 50 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 18 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 5 | 12 | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 40 | — | 60 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 2550% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | 954% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $6.5B | — | $37.4M | $711.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2025 |