The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAR · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STRA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MAR | FSS | STRA | CDW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 | 83 (highest) | 81 | 77 |
| Pricing power | — | 43 (highest) | — | 23 |
| Returns on capital | 78 | 56 | 11 | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 15 | 84 | 100 (highest) | 65 |
| Capital discipline | 100 (highest) | 76 | 80 | 86 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 270% above high estimate | 106% above high estimate | 93% above high estimate | 24% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $97.6B | $7.0B | $1.7B | $16.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |