The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MAS · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OTIS · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MAS | OTIS | CNXN | EPAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) | 62 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 68 (highest) | 66 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 60 | — | 22 | 69 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 100 (highest) | 53 | 38 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 53 | 34 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 78 (highest) | 49 | 72 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 73% above high estimate | No price data | 60% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $15.8B | — | $2.0B | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |