The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MGM · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BRLT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SMP · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | MGM | BRLT | SMP | GME |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 | 47 (highest) | 46 | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 23 | 84 (highest) | 40 |
| Pricing power | — | 78 (highest) | 52 | 40 |
| Returns on capital | 55 (highest) | — | 49 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 14 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 40 | 30 | 34 | 45 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 6% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 63% above high estimate | 62% above high estimate | 3036% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $12.0B | $17.1M | $837.8M | $9.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |