The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MITQ · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GANX · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MITQ | ETON | TWST | GANX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 50 | 66 (highest) | 43 |
| Pricing power | 42 | 70 (highest) | 34 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 35 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $5.4M | $1.1B | $5.3B | $68.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |