The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MLGO · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MLGO | UPLD | KE | PDFS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 38 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 32 | 58 (highest) | 57 |
| Pricing power | 25 | 98 (highest) | 24 | 90 |
| Returns on capital | 50 (highest) | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 40 | 48 | 21 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 24 | 38 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 647% above high estimate | No price data | 67% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $177.2M | $143.6M | $578.6M | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2022 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |