The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ULH · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SYM · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MMCP | ULH | CETX | SYM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 | 51 | 59 (highest) | 57 |
| Pricing power | 28 | — | 60 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 27 (highest) | 7 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 46 | 59 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 67% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $379.2M | $2.4M | $24.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |