The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NRDY · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NRDY | WMT | PSMT | BLBD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 73 | 93 (highest) | 65 |
| Pricing power | 97 (highest) | 44 | 18 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | — | 75 | 53 | 93 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 72 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 57 | 56 | 60 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 182% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 648% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $99.7M | — | $5.5B | $2.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |