The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
NTSK · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | NTSK | DT | DIOD | AMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 66 | 67 (highest) | 66 | 66 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 78 (highest) | 71 | 74 |
| Pricing power | 96 | 99 (highest) | 54 | 58 |
| Returns on capital | — | 14 | 42 | 74 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 73 | 82 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 70 | 82 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 350% above high estimate | 59% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 1185% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $2.9B | $13.2B | $4.0B | $820.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |