The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OI | HUN | FUST | DSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 32 | 23 | 0 | 38 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 28 | 19 | 87 (highest) | 19 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 33 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 0 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 64 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 25% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $2.1B | $1.2M | $5.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |