The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DTGI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PNXP · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ON | SPT | DTGI | PNXP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 24 | 60 | 65 (highest) | 20 |
| Pricing power | 51 | 100 (highest) | 54 | 91 |
| Returns on capital | 62 (highest) | 0 | — | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 61 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 97% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $34.4B | $444M | $675913 | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 |