The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ONEI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ONEI | SES | STI | MSGM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 70 (highest) | 50 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 88 (highest) | 70 | 80 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | — | 9 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 28 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 35 | 51 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $4.7M | $212.8M | $49.0M | $22.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |