The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ONMD · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
QVCDQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
VOYG · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ONMD | QVCDQ | CHGG | VOYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | — | 30 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 0 | 60 | 91 (highest) | 25 |
| Returns on capital | — | 16 (highest) | 11 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 34 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 78% below high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $35.3M | — | $96.9M | $1.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |