The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OPLN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BIAF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OPLN | ATRO | VSEC | BIAF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 24 | 75 (highest) | 32 | 57 |
| Pricing power | — | 18 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 9 (highest) | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 58 (highest) | 56 | 37 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 20 | 1 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 142% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 1250% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $4.1B | — | $4.6B | $3.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |