The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OVV · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | OVV | HNI | FBIN | REI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 61 | 74 (highest) | 57 |
| Pricing power | — | 61 | 48 | 87 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 44 | 46 (highest) | 36 | 13 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 36 | 40 (highest) | 17 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 37 | 21 | 54 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 7% below high estimate | 104% above high estimate | 15% above high estimate | 64% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $14.6B | $2.9B | $6.0B | $267.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |